1. Home
  2. Q&A

Breast augmentation and pregnancy

I am 24, weigh 48kg and about 163cm in height. I am currently an A cup and I am about to book a breast augmentation for October and have been recommended 295g textured round cohesive gel implants, full projection with sub pectoral dual plane position and insertion in lower breast fold. This will apparently take me to a full C cup. I am thinking about going slightly larger with a 320g implant. My partner and I are wanting to try for children next year which will be 3 months post op approximately. A lot of girls have told me to wait and my surgeon recommended stated that if I do go ahead now as long as I am prepared that I might want them fixed in the future. I have wanted this procedure done for a loooong time and realistically if I wait until after children it could be another 10 plus years which I don't think I am prepared to do. My questions are as follows: 1. Given my small size now, is it better to go with the small implant and are the effects of pregnancy likely to be less prominent on a small implant? 2. Regarding the positioning of the implant, is a total under the muscle or the sub pectoral position likely to look good still after pregnancy? My surgeon recommended sub pectoral for a natural tear drop look however I don't mind if they look higher after breast augmentation so then after pregnancy they still look good. 3. In your experience, how have girls implant and who started with small breasts like mine looked after pregnancy. Some girls say they were ruined and some say they look fine. I know you can't accurately predict but I'm trying to get as much information as possible to make an informed decision.

Raaach September 3rd, 2016 SA

  • Answer
    Mr Mark Ashton

    Mark Ashton

    2 answers

    Plastic Surgeon
    Victoria, Australia

    Dear Raach, I suspect from your photos that you will have less than 2 cm of sub- cutaneous tissue in the upper pole of your breast and hence I would agree that you are best suited to a sub pectoral pocket. I wouldn't go above the muscle unless you specifically wanted a visible / prominent upper edge of the implant.  There tends to be some atrophy of the soft tissue in the upper chest as we age which will make the edge of the implant more prominent over time. Given that your nipple is in the centre of your breast I would use a dual plane one (or standard) technique. A 295 cc implant will take you to a small C.After breast feeding, most patients tend to lose volume in the upper pole and hence I would suggest a round implant over a tear drop / anatomical.  The end result after pregnancy is determined by how much stretch you put on the supporting ligaments within your breast. The more these ligaments are stretched, the more sag -or ptosis- you will have after pregnancy. The biggest factors therefore are how big your breasts become during breast feeding, if you put on a lot of weight during pregnancy and the size of the implant you choose before becoming pregnant. The difference between 295 and 320 isnt going to make a make a major difference, and hence if you want a slightly fuller look- I would go with the 320I would agree with your surgeon, there is a small risk that you might require additional sugery after you have finished your family, particularly if you have 3 or 4 children. This is unpredictable, but given that that you are slim, have minimal or no ptosis and are choosing a moderate size implant, I wouldn't let this be a reason for you delaying your surgery.
    Good luck! 
    With kind regards MarkProfessor Mark Ashton MD, FRACS, MBBS